\n<\/p>\n
Revealing the limitations of cloning, researchers who repeatedly cloned mice for two decades have discovered that such serial duplication triggers grave genetic mutations that accumulate over the generations and ultimately become fatal.<\/p>\n
A total of 1,206 cloned laboratory mice were generated by the scientists from a single female donor mouse from 2005 \u200cto 2025 in research conducted in Japan. There were no outward signs of trouble through the first 25 generations, but mutations subsequently began piling up until becoming fatal. The 58th generation of clones, burdened by mutations but with no visible physical abnormalities, died within a few days of birth.<\/p>\n
The research contradicted the notion that clones are identical copies of the original donor animal and disproved the idea that cloning using current technology could be carried out indefinitely with no ill effects.<\/p>\n
“No one has ever continued re-cloning for this long before. As a result, this is the first time we’ve discovered that repeated re-cloning eventually reaches its limits,” said developmental biologist Teruhiko Wakayama of the University of Yamanashi, senior author of the research published on Tuesday in \u2060the journal Nature Communications.<\/p>\n
“It was once believed that clones were identical to the original, but it has become clear through this study that mutations occur at a rate three times higher than in offspring born through natural mating,” Wakayama said. “Because all these mutations continue to accumulate, mammals cannot sustain their species through cloning. This study has revealed one of the reasons why mammals, unlike plants and lower animals, cannot maintain their species through cloning.”<\/p>\n
After generating the first clone, the researchers repeated the process every three to four months, cloning each generation from the one preceding it. Like the original donor mouse, all the clones were females with brown fur.<\/p>\n
The researchers published preliminary results in 2013 spanning the first 25 generations that found the clones to be healthy, with no apparent negative effects.<\/p>\n
“At that time, we concluded that re-cloning could likely continue indefinitely. However, in that study, we did not examine the genetic sequences. We continued our research for 13 more years, and as a result, we discovered that our previous conclusion was incorrect – that is, there is a limit to re-cloning,” Wakayama said.<\/p>\n
The researchers sequenced the genomes of 10 clones from the various generations to understand what was happening at the genetic level.<\/p>\n
They found \u200cthat serial cloning \u2060produced an effect akin to duplicating a picture using a copying machine. With the first copy, the image quality deteriorates slightly. When copying that copied image, the quality deteriorates further. Repeating the process numerous times yields an image very different from the original.<\/p>\n
The study results, they said, pointed to the importance of sexual reproduction in countering deleterious genetic mutations in mammals.<\/p>\n
The researchers gauged the fertility of the clones by mating them with ordinary male mice. Up to the 20th generation, they gave birth to about 10 babies per litter, just like ordinary female mice. But eventually the clones began having smaller litters, reflecting the effects of accumulating mutations.<\/p>\n
The researchers used a technique \u2060called nuclear transfer to generate the clones. The same method was used to produce Dolly the sheep, the first successfully cloned mammal, at a laboratory in Scotland in 1996, and Cumulina, the first successfully cloned mouse, at a lab in Hawaii in 1998.<\/p>\n
With nuclear transfer technology, researchers create an embryo by transferring the nucleus, a cell’s primary repository of genetic information, from a donor cell into an egg cell whose own nucleus was removed. A \u2060specialized ovarian cell, called a cumulus cell, that surrounds and nurtures a developing egg was used in the cloning.<\/p>\n
“We had believed that we could create an infinite number of clones. That is why these results are so disappointing. At this point, we have no ideas for overcoming this limitation. I believe we need to develop a new method that fundamentally improves nuclear transfer technology,” Wakayama said.<\/p>\n
An increase in \u2060large-scale harmful mutations began with the 27th generation including chromosomal abnormalities. For instance, one copy of the X chromosome was lost. Chromosomes are threadlike structures that carry genetic information from cell to cell. In mammals, females carry two X chromosomes, one inherited from each biological parent.<\/p>\n
“In cloning, all genes are passed on to the next generation, meaning that all defective genes are also passed on,” Wakayama said.<\/p>\n<\/p><\/div>\n